Neurotechnologies: the need for an ethical commitment in their implementation

Authors

  • Mauricio Barrera-Valencia Universidad de Antioquia
  • Liliana Calderon-Delgado Universidad CES

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21615/cesp.3573

Abstract

Today, we are attending a growing supply of "neuro" services with the promise to improve the academic performance of children, achieve greater labor competitiveness and enjoy more satisfying social and affective relationships. Unfortunately, studies in which most of these developments are based are far from standards of validity and replicability to ensure their effectiveness. Even worse, many of the professionals who are providing these services lack adequate education and training that enables not only to use good equipment but also interpret the results and make appropriate adjustments to ensure greater well-being for patients, clients or students.  It is clear that, the growth and use of these neurotechnologies can bring huge benefits for people, but for this, it is necessary to promote further development of research in the area, to evaluate the effectiveness of these procedures and allow quality training of human resources responsible for its implementation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Mauricio Barrera-Valencia, Universidad de Antioquia

Doctor en Psicología con Orientación en Neurociencia Cognitiva Aplicada. Coordinador Línea de Neurodesarrollo y Neuropsicología Grupo de Investigación en Psicología Cognitiva, Universidad de Antioquia.

Liliana Calderon-Delgado, Universidad CES

Psicóloga, Especialista en salud Mental del Niño y el Adolesecente, Doctora en Psicología, Coordinadora del Laboratorio de Psicometría y Docente de la Facultad de Psicología de la Universidad CES

References

Capen, N. (1834). Annals of Phrenology. Marsh, Capen & Lyon. Boston: EEUU.

Eaton, M.L. & Illes, J. (2007). Commercializing cognitive neurotechnology- The ethical terrain. Nature Biotechnology 25 (4), 393-397.

Interlandi, J. (marzo, 2015). The brain empathy gap. The New York Times. Consultado el 10 de septiembre de 2015 http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/22/magazine/the-brains-empathy-gap.html?ref=topics&_r=0

Ledoux, J. (2015). The Amygdala Is NOT the Brain's Fear Center. Psychology Today. Consultado el 15 agosto de 2015 www.psychologytoday.com/blog/i-got-mind-tell-you/201508/the-amygdala-is-not-the-brains-fear-center

Library of Congress. (1990). Project on the Decade of the Brain. Consultado el 13 de septiembre de 2015. http://www.loc.gov/loc/brain/

Lucas Lucas, R. (2001). No todo aquello que es técnicamente posible es moralmente admisible. Antropología y problemas bioéticos. Madrid: BAC.

Neuroinsights. (2014). Neurotech Industry Report. Consultado el 12 de agosto de 2015. http://www.neuroinsights.com/#!neurotechreport2014/cmca

Pavlov. I.P. (1929/1997). Los reflejos condicionados. Madrid: Morata.

Sample, I. (2014). This is your brain trying to be funny. The Guardian. Consultado el 12 de septiembre de 2015 http://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/nov/14/brain-joke-funny-comedians

Published

2015-10-31

How to Cite

Barrera-Valencia, M., & Calderon-Delgado, L. (2015). Neurotechnologies: the need for an ethical commitment in their implementation. Revista CES Psicología, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.21615/cesp.3573