Legal innovation: Concepts, Need and Experiences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21615/cesder.7832Keywords:
legal innovation, legal tech, legal design, legal project managementAbstract
This article seeks to explore the concept of innovation (and legal innovation), as well as its main currents and manifestations, such as legal tech, legal design thinking, and legal project management. It also seeks to justify the need to further develop and adopt them given the limited quantity and quality of access to public and private legal services. It also seeks to shed light on some national and international experiences in these disciplines.
Downloads
References
American Bar Association (ABA) (2016). Report on the future of legal services in the United States.
Baregheh, Anahita, Rowley, Jennifer y Sambrook, Sally (2009). Towards a Multidisciplinary Definition of Innovation. Management Decision. 47. 10.1108/00251740910984578.
BCG & Bucerius Law School (2016). How legal technologies will change the business of law.
Bodolica, V. y Spraggon, M. (2021). Incubating innovation in university settings: building entrepreneurial mindsets in the future generation of innovative emerging market leaders. Education + Training, Vol. 63, No. 4, pp. 613 – 631.
Boston Consulting Group (2016). Bucerius Law. p. 3.
Consejo Superior de la Judicatura (2019). https://app.powerbi.com/view?r=eyJrIjoiNTkzM2IxMzgtOTU0Ny00Mjc0LWE3ZTItMTJjMmNhMTg0OTFiIiwidCI6IjYyMmNiYTk4LTgwZjgtNDFmMy04ZGY1LThlYjk5OTAxNTk4YiIsImMiOjR9
Cepeda, M. y Otálora, G. (2020). Modernización de la administración de justicia a través de la inteligencia artificial. Fedesarrollo.
Corrales, Marcelo, Fenwick, Mark y Haapio, Helena (ed.) (2019). "Legal Tech, Smart Contracts and Blockchain," Perspectives in Law, Business and Innovation, Springer, number 978-981-13-6086-2, December.
Cuc, J. y Miina, A. (2018). Classyfying the business model from a strategic and innovation perspective. Journal of business models. Vol 6. pp. 15–18.
De Souza, Siddharth Peter. (2022). The spread of legal tech solutionism and the need for legal design. European Journal of Risk Regulation (EJRR), 13(3), 373-388.
DeJusticia. Ante la Justicia (2014). Necesidades jurídicas y acceso a la justicia en Colombia. Bogotá.
DeJusticia (2016). Democracia, Justicia y sociedad; 10 años de investigación en DeJusticia. Bogotá.
Demil, Benoît y Lecocq, Xavier (2010). Business Model Evolution: In Search of Dynamic Consistency. Long Range Planning 43, 227-246. Long Range Planning. 10.1016/j.lrp.2010.02.004.
Departamento Nacional de Planeación (2022). https://colaboracion.dnp.gov.co/CDT/Desarrollo%20Digital/UCD/Proyectos/2022_P02_Estimacion_necesidades_juridicas/Informe_Final.pdf
El Espectador (2019). https://www.elespectador.com/economia/colombia-el-segundo-pais-con-mas-abogados-en-el-mundo-article-698171/
Fenwick, M. Kaal y W., Vermulen, E. (2018). Legal education in a digital age. Why coding matters for the lawyer of the future. Tilburg University.
Fliegner, W. (2017). Analysis of the business model elements and their relationships. Global Challenges of management control and reporting, 474, pp. 53–64.
Oliver Gassmann, Karolin Frankenberger y Michaela, Csik (2014). Revolutionizing the Business Model. En: Gassmann, O. and Schweitzer, F., Eds., Management of the Fuzzy Front End of Innovation, Springer, New York, 89-98.
Hagan, Margaret, directora del Legal Design Lab de la Universidad de Stanford, https://lawbydesign.co/legal-design/
Hagan, Margaret. (2020). Legal design as a thing: a theory of change and set of methods to craft a human centered legal system. Design Issues, Vol. 36, nº 3, p. 3 - 15.
Hill, S. (2016). Raw deal: how the uber economy and runaway capitalism are screwing american workers. London, UK, St. Martin Press.
Harvard Business Review (2018). Two Questions to Ask Before You Set Up an Innovation Unit. Recuperado de: https://hbr.org/2018/07/two-questions-to-ask-before-you-set-up-an-innovation-unit.
Hernández Sampieri, R. et al. (2018). Metodología de la investigación: las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. McGraw Hill, México.
Hongdao, Bibi, Khan, Ardito y Khaskeli (2019). Legal technologies in action: the future of the legal market in light of disruptive innovations. En Sustainability, # 11, pp 1-19.
International Bar Association (2016). Times are a-changing: disruptive innovation and the legal profession.
Johnson, Mark W., Clayton M. Christensen y Henning Kagermann (2008). Reinventing Your Business Model, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 86, nº. 12, p. 58 -68.
Kerikmäe, Tanel, Hoffmann, Thomas y Chochia, Archil (2021). Legal Technology for Law Firms: Determining Roadmaps for Innovation. Croatian International Relations Review. Vol. 24 No. 81 (2018).
Khumalo, M. y van der Lingen, E. (2017). The open Business model in a dynamic business environment: a literatura review. South African journal of industrial engineering. Vol 28. pp. 147-160.
Legal Design Alliance. https://www.legaldesignalliance.org/
Lerma Gonzalez, H. (2009). Metodología de la investigación: propuesta, anteproyecto, Proyecto. 4ta ED. ECOE, Bogotá. p. 198.
Kurdve, M., Bird, A. y Jens Laage-Hellman, J. (2020). Establishing SME–university collaboration through innovation support programmes. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management. Vol. 31 No. 8, pp. 1583-1604.
Morell, J. (2019). Breve historia de la innovación legal: anticipando el futuro a través del pasado. En: Legal Tech La transformación digital de la abogacía. Wolters Kluwer.
Newton, J. (2020). The client centered law firm. Blue Check Publishing.
Openheimer, A. (2018). ¡Sálvese quien pueda! El futuro del trabajo en la era de la automatización, Ciudad de México, México, Nomos.
Osterwalder, A. (2004) The Business Model Ontology—A Proposition in a Design Science Approach. PhD Thesis, University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
Osterwalder, A. y Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation. Wiley. USA. P. 14.
Owen, O. Roach, McLaughlin, Gregory C. y McLaughlin, Heidi M. (2020). Innovation and Value: Customer Perception, Application, and Concept. Journal of Management & Public Policy, Vol. 12, n° 1, December, p. 4-16.
Perry - Kessaris, Amanda. (2019). Legal design for practice, activism, policy and research. Journal of law and society, Vol. 46, nº 2, June, p. 185 – 210.
Pierce, J. y Delbecq, A. (1976). Organization structure, individual attitudes and innovation. Symposium: Organizations and technology.
Piston, H. (2016). Disrupting Law School: How disruptive innovation will revolutionize the legal world.
Pose Vidal, M. (2019). Legal Design Thinking. En Legal Tech La transformación digital de la abogacía. Wolters Kluwer.
Ramírez, Martha C. Rodríguez, María del P y González, José P. (2019) Revisión de la Literatura sobre el Enfoque Estratégico de los Modelos de Negocios. Información Tecnológica, Vol. 30, num. 6, p. 177-192.
Rodrigues Marques, H. Aparecida de Oliveira, T., Meirelles Andrade, D. y Zambalde, A. (2019). University entrepreneurship. in Brazil: Panorama of the technological innovation centers of universities. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 149-158.
Sanjay, Singh y Aggarwal, Yogita (2022). In search of a consensus definition of innovation: a qualitative synthesis of 208 definitions using grounded theory approach, Innovation. The European Journal of Social Science Research, 35:2, 177-195. DOI: 10.1080/13511610.2021.1925526
Santuber, Joaquin. et al. (2018). The need for a legal design metatheory for the emergence of change in the creative legal society. Conference paper: JURIX 2018 Workshop "Legal Design as Academic Discipline: Foundations, Methodology, Applications" At: Groningen, Netherlands.
Sawhney, M., Wolcott, R., Arroniz, I. (2007). The Twelve Different Ways for Companies to Innovate. Engineering Management Review.
The Law Society (2017). The future of law and innovation in the profession (FLIP).
Will, M., Kfairy, A., Mousa, M. Robert, B. (2019). How organizational structure transforms risky innovations into performance – a computer simulation. Simulation modelling practice and theory, 94, 264 -285.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 CES Derecho
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
