An approach to the state responsibility by an omission in The Inter- American Court of Human Rights Jurisprudence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21615/cesder.3442Keywords:
Inter-American Court of Human Rights, state responsibility, omission, human rightsAbstract
This paper will analyze the jurisprudential development and doctrine of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in relation to the international responsibility of the state, focusing on the cases where the liability was held because of an omission imputable to the state. The analysis will be done from its pronouncements under its contentious functions, seeking to identify the main lines of argument and the most representative cases. The jurisprudential search is not going to be exhaustive, but illustrative of the major developments of the idea of state responsibility based on an omission of the state.
Downloads
References
Alexy, R. (1993). Teoría de los derechos fundamentales. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales.
Barnidge, R. (2008). Non-state actors and terrorism: applying the law of state responsibility and due diligence principle, The Hague: T.M.C Asser Press.
Crawford, J. (2013). State Responsibility. London: Cambridge University Press.
De Luca, J. (1997). Introducción a la Teoría del Derecho. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.
Hobbes, T. (2001). El Leviatán. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
International Law Commission. (2001). Articles on the Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts. Geneve: United Nations.
Latty, F. (2010). “Actions and omissions”, In Crawford, J., Pellet, A. & Olleson, S. (eds), The Law of International Resposibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vienna Convention. (1961) Diplomatic Relations. vailable at: http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conven-tions/9_1_1961.pdf
Hannum, H. et al. (2011). International human rights problems of law, policy, and practice. New york: Aspen Publishers.
I/A Court H.R., (1988). Case Velásquez Rodríguez. (Merits, Reparations and Costs). Judgment of July 29.
I/A Court H.R., (1989). Case Godínez Cruz vs. Honduras. (Merits). Judgment of January 20.
I/A Court H.R., (1989b). Case Fairén Garbi y Solís Corrales vs. Honduras.(Merits). . Judgment March 15.
I/A Court H.R., (2001). Case La Última Tentación de Cristo(Olmedo Bustos y otros) v. Chile (Merits), Judgment of February 5.
I/A Court H.R., (2004). Case of the Case of the 19 Merchants v. Colombia. Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of July 5, 2004.
I/A Court of HR, (2005). Case of the Mapiripán Massacre v. Colombia, (Merits, Reparations, and Costs) Judgment of September 15.
I/A Court H.R., (2006). Case of the Pueblo Bello Massacre v. Colombia. (Merits, Reparations and Costs). Judgment of January 31.
I/A Court H.R., (2007). Case of the Rochela Massacre v. Colombia. Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of May 11, 2007.
I/A Court H.R., (2012). Case of Pacheco Teruel et al. v. Honduras. (Merits, reparations and costs). Judgment of April 27.
International Court of Justice, (1949). Corfu Channel Case, April 9. Available at: http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=3&k=cd&case=1
International Court of Justice, (1980). Concerning United States Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Tehran Case, May 24. Available at: http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/64/6293.pdf
Lysén, G. (1997). “State responsibility and international liability of states for lawful acts”, Uppsala: IUSTUS FÖRLAG.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Revista CES Derecho
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
